Editorial Standards

Last reviewed: August 26, 2026

Our standard

Every guide must answer a real reader question in clear language, distinguish general information from individualized advice, and give a practical next step that does not depend on buying a service. We do not publish outcome promises, universal deadlines, invented case examples, or unsupported claims about rights and remedies.

Jurisdiction and freshness

Law and procedure vary by state, locality, court, agency, and facts. Each high-stakes page must display its geographic scope, reviewed date, and official sources. State-specific pages require the controlling state or local source. Court forms, deadlines, fees, eligibility, licensing, and complaint routes are checked before publication and reviewed when an authority changes them.

Editorial and commercial separation

Payment, affiliate value, common ownership, or access to a provider cannot buy a favorable conclusion. Sponsored material is labeled. Paid placement is not mixed into legal-aid, lawyer, court, or agency routing. We do not sell priority in an editorial list.

AI-assisted work

Software may help organize research, check links, compare drafts, or flag unclear language. It cannot serve as a lawyer or accountable reviewer. An editor remains responsible for every released page, and unsupported text is removed rather than published to fill a gap.

Authorship and review labels

Organizational bylines describe the desk responsible for the page. “Attorney reviewed” appears only after a real, identified lawyer reviews the exact version. We never invent a credential, bar admission, client experience, testimonial, or professional relationship.

Related policies

These policies apply to LegalHelpOnline.org unless a page displays a more specific notice.